Rhetorical Analysis Essay - 896 Words

Chris Porter ENG 105-14 January 29, 2012 Rhetorical Analysis Spandex is No Good! In the essay, â€Å"What You Eat is Your Business†, Radley Balko writes to tell his audience about how the government is trying to control people’s health and eating habits by restricting food, taxing high calorie food, and considering menu labeling. Balko includes in his essay that government restricting diets and having socialist insurance is not helping the obesity problem, but it is only making it worse because it not allowing people to take their health in to their own hands so they have no drive to lose weight or eat healthy. In his essay, Balko is targeting society, including those who may be obese, he is trying to show them that the laws our†¦show more content†¦In Balko’s essay, he used the logical appeal to show his audience that his essay has factual information in it. He uses the logical appeal to let his audience know that he is using logical information; he used actual legislature and details of our country’s insurance system a s examples of logical and factual information. An example the of logical appeal in Balko’s essay is â€Å"Senator Joe Lieberman and Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown, among others, have called for a ‘fat tax’ on high calorie foods. Congress is now considering menu-labeling legislation, which would force restaurants to send every menu item to the laboratory for nutritional testingâ€Å"(158). Another factual piece of information Balko used was, â€Å"For decades now, America’s health care system been migrating toward socialism. Your well-being, shape, and condition have increasingly been deemed matters of ‘public health’ instead of matters of personal responsibility.† (158). Balko uses these examples of legislature and the health care system to make his views on our country’s obesity issue to relate to his audience’s logic because they may have some background knowledge about things that they have seen or read on these issues. I n Balko’s essay, he used the ethical appeal to show his audience that his essay has credible and believable information in it. He uses the ethical appeal toShow MoreRelatedThe Tipping Point: Rhetorical Analysis Essay813 Words   |  4 PagesThe Tipping Point: Rhetorical Analysis Throughout The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell explains to his reader his ideas about drastic changes in society, and how they seem to occur so rapidly. In this particular selection, Gladwell emphasizes the purpose of â€Å"connectors†, saying that they have a â€Å"special gift for bringing the world together (page 38)†. Gladwell states that part of the reason information or trends spread like wildfire is the presence of a specific group of people. They are called â€Å"connecters†Read MoreRhetorical Analysis Of The Death Of The Moth And On Keeping A Notebook 1427 Words   |  6 Pages19, September, 2014 9th Ni Device Use Analysis Rhetoric devices are often used by writers to clarify ideas, emphasize key points, or relate insights to the reader. In both â€Å"The Death of the Moth† and â€Å"On Keeping A Notebook, † the authors heavily rely on such devices to get their points across to the audience, and these devices help strengthen overall theme the authors want to communicate. Though several may argue that Didion’s use of metaphor and rhetorical question compliment her essay very wellRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Reagans Farewell Address1653 Words   |  7 PagesThe Usage of Rhetoric in Ronald Reagan’s â€Å"Farewell Address† Due to the rapidly changing America, in his farewell address, Ronald Reagan expresses the need for unification of America, and America’s culture. In Reagan’s address, he uses many rhetorical devices to advance his purpose of unifying America, for instance, Reagan utilizes tone, syntax, and pathos to portray his pride, hopefulness, and patriotism for America. He uses these devices to show Americans of the unification America needs. ThroughoutRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Lesson In Hbos The Newsroom715 Words   |  3 Pagesis even used in classrooms for the powerful rhetoric that is used in it. In Will McAvoy’s speech on â€Å"The Newsroom†, McAvoy uses a variety of rhetorical devices such as Anthypophora, Asyndeton, and Dysphemism to convey the message that America is not the greatest country in the world anymore. First, Anthypophora is one of the three most effective rhetorical devices used in this powerful speech. Anthypophora is when the speaker asks a question, but instead of letting someone answer, the speaker immediatelyRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Ellen DeGeneress Commencement Speech Essay1144 Words   |  5 Pages Ellen’s Commencement Speech Rhetorical Analysis Graduation caps fly into the air, cheers erupt, and diplomas are received. This is a typical graduation day. Not only did these ceremonial events take place for Tulane Universitys class of 2009, but Ellen DeGeneres was there to congratulate them as well! This class was dubbed the Katrina Class for being survivors of the devastating Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Katrina was named one of the deadliest Hurricanes, causing more than 1,836Read MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr.976 Words   |  4 Pagespopulation? In all of the speeches, one way or another, Dr. King used several different rhetorical devices in order to defend his own actions. In specific, two of his speeches, â€Å"I have a Dream† and â€Å"Letter from a Birmingham Jail† Dr. King used the rhetorical devices of anaphora, allusion, and diction to relay his thoughts of what is right, and also as a way to build a common ground with his audience. Though the rhetorical devices are share d between the two speeches, there are also several differences.Read MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Andrew Sinek s Ted Presentation1263 Words   |  6 Pagesstock that s going in the opposite direction—down—from the most desired direction—up. This is a provocative opening that engages the audience right away. 2. Ask a series of rhetorical questions. A common way to engage the audience at the start is to ask a rhetorical question. Better still, start with a series of rhetorical questions. A good example of this tactic is Simon Sinek s TED presentation. He starts with: How do you explain when things don t go as we assumed? Or better, how do you explainRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of A Life Beyond Do What You Love 1020 Words   |  5 PagesIn his New York Times article â€Å"A Life Beyond Do What You Love† Gordon Marino poses the question But is do what you love wisdom or malarkey? after giving us an anecdote about students coming to him for career advice. The article which uses many rhetorical devices which make the audience think about their choices in careers and what you should and want to do. The author also cites different sources for his article and past life experiences. Marino then end his article by saying many great leadersRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of A Life Beyond D o What You Love Essay2042 Words   |  9 Pagesuse of rhetorical devices. Dr. Marino is a very highly educated philosopher who earned his Ph.D. at University of Chicago, M.A. university of Pennsylvania, and B.A. Columbia University. He typically publishes to the New York Times, for his writing mostly appeals to all people because so many can relate to this article. Marino effectively argues that sometimes individuals must sacrifice their passions to provide for their loved ones using rhetorical devices, hypophora, anecdote, rhetorical questionsRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Rhetorical And Rhetorical Analysis1188 Words   |  5 Pages1. Rhetorical Analysis is the careful examination of texts, videos, and images to understand how they function in conveying their message. The definition of rhetorical analysis will help me better understand what I should be looking for when I receive a text, as rhetorical analysis is different than literary analysis. Therefore, the devices for each are also different (Lunsford et al. 88). 2. Intended audience is the initial step to any rhetorical analysis. If you are unable to identify an audience

The Stupidest Angel Chapter 8 Free Essays

Chapter 8 HOLIDAY HEARTBREAK Christmas Amnesty. You can fall out of contact with a friend, fail to return calls, ignore e-mails, avoid eye contact at the Thrifty-Mart, forget birthdays, anniversaries, and reunions, and if you show up at their house during the holidays (with a gift) they are socially bound to forgive you – act like nothing happened. Decorum dictates that the friendship move forward from that point, without guilt or recrimination. We will write a custom essay sample on The Stupidest Angel Chapter 8 or any similar topic only for you Order Now If you started a chess game ten years ago in October, you need only remember whose move it is – or why you sold the chessboard and bought an Xbox in the interim. (Look, Christmas Amnesty is a wonderful thing, but it’s not a dimensional shift. The laws of time and space continue to apply, even if you have been avoiding your friends. But don’t try using the expansion of the universe as an excuse – like you kept meaning to stop by, but their house kept getting farther away. That crap won’t wash. Just say, â€Å"Sorry I haven’t called. Merry Christmas.† Then show the present. Christmas Amnesty protocol dictates that your friend say, â€Å"That’s okay,† and let you in without further comment. This is the way it has always been done.) â€Å"Where the fuck have you been?† said Gabe Fenton when he opened the door and saw his old friend Theophilus Crowe standing there, holding a present. Gabe, forty-five, short and wiry, unshaven and slightly balding, was wearing khakis that looked like he’d slept in them for a week. â€Å"Merry Christmas, Gabe,† said Theo, holding out the present, a big red bow on it – sort of waving the box back and forth as if to say, Hey, I have a present here, you’re not supposed to sandbag me for not calling for three years. â€Å"Yeah, nice,† said Gabe. â€Å"But you might have called.† â€Å"Sorry. I meant to, but you were involved with Val, I didn’t want to interrupt.† â€Å"She dumped me, you know?† Gabe had been seeing Valerie Riordan, the town’s only psychiatrist, for several years now. Not for the last month, however. â€Å"Yeah, I heard about that.† Theo had heard that Val wanted someone who was a little more involved with human culture than Gabe. Gabe was a behavioral field biologist who studied wild rodents or marine mammals, depending on who was providing the funding. He lived at a small federally owned cottage by the lighthouse with his hundred-pound black Labrador retriever, Skinner. â€Å"You heard? And you didn’t call?† It was nearly noon, and Theo’s buzz had mostly worn off, but he was still thrown. Guys were not supposed to lament the lack of support from a friend, unless it was backup in a bar fight or help in moving heavy stuff. This was not normal behavior. Maybe Gabe really did need to spend more time around human beings. â€Å"Look, Gabe, I brought you a present,† Theo said. â€Å"Look at how glad Skinner is to see me.† Skinner was, in fact, glad to see Theo. He was crowding Gabe in the doorway, his beefy tail beating against the open door like a Snausage war drum. He associated Theo with hamburgers and pizza, and had once thought of him as the emergency backup Food Guy (Gabe being the primary Food Guy). â€Å"Well, I suppose you should come in,† said Gabe. The biologist stepped away from the door and allowed Theo to enter. Skinner said hi by shoving his nose into Theo’s crotch. â€Å"I’m working in here, so things are a little messy.† A little messy? An understatement on a par with calling the Bataan Death March a nature hike – it looked like someone had loaded all of Gabe’s belongings into a cannon and fired them into the room through the wall. Dirty laundry and dishes covered every surface except for Gabe’s worktable, which, except for the rats, was immaculate. â€Å"Nice rats,† Theo said. â€Å"What are you doing with them?† â€Å"I’m studying them.† Gabe sat down in front of a series of five-gallon aquariums arranged around a center tank in a star pattern and linked by Habitrail tubes, with gates for routing rats from one chamber to another. Each of the rats had a silver disk about the size of a quarter glued to its back. Theo watched as Gabe opened a gate and one of the rats rushed to the center tank and immediately tried to mount its occupant. Gabe picked up a small remote control and hit the button. The attacking rat nearly did a backflip trying to retreat. â€Å"Ha! That’ll teach ‘im,† Gabe shouted. â€Å"The female in the center cage is in estrus.† The rat backed away tentatively and did some sniffing, then attempted to mount the female again. Gabe hit the button. The male was jolted off of her. â€Å"Ha! Now do you get it?!† Gabe said maniacally. He looked up from the cages to Theo. â€Å"There are electrodes on their testes. The silver disks are batteries and remote receivers. Every time he gets sexually aroused, I’m hitting his little nuts with fifty volts.† The rat made another attempt and again Gabe hit the button. The rat spazzed its way to the corner of the cage. â€Å"You stupid shit!† Gabe shouted. â€Å"You think they’d learn. I’ll hit each of them with the jolt a dozen times today, but when I open the cage tomorrow, they’ll all run back in and try to mount her again. You see, you see how we are?† â€Å"We?† â€Å"Us. Males. See how we are. We know there’s going to be nothing but pain, but we go back again and again.† Gabe had always been so steady, so calm, so professionally detached, scientifically obsessed, so dependably nerdy – Theo felt as if he were talking to a whole different person, like someone had scrubbed off all the intellect and had exposed the nerves. â€Å"Uh, Gabe, I’m not sure that we should equate ourselves with rodents. I mean – ; â€Å"Oh, sure. That’s what you say now. But you’ll call me and tell me I was right. Something will happen and you’ll call. She’ll stomp your heart and you’ll finish the destruction she starts. Am I right? Am I right?† â€Å"Uh, I – † Theo was thinking about the graveyard sex followed by the fight he’d had with Molly last night. â€Å"So I’m going to change the association. Watch this.† Gabe stormed over to a bookshelf, threw aside a bunch of professional journals and notebooks until he found what he was looking for. â€Å"See. See her.† Gabe held up a recent Victoria’s Secret catalog. The model on the front was wearing garments spectacularly inadequate in concealing her appeal. She looked as if she just couldn’t be happier about it. â€Å"Beautiful, right? Amazing, right? Hold that thought.† Gabe reached into the pocket of his khakis and pulled out a stainless remote just like the one on the rat table. â€Å"Beautiful,† he said, and he hit the button. The biologist’s back arched and he suddenly became six inches taller, all the muscles of his body seeming to flex at once. He convulsed twice, then fell to the floor, the crumpled catalog still in his hand. Skinner lapsed into a barking fit. Don’t die, Food Guy, my bowl is on the porch and I can’t open the door by myself, he was saying. It was the same every time, he was always glad when the Food Guy wasn’t actually dead, but the Food Guy’s convulsions made him anxious. Theo rushed to his friend’s aid. Gabe’s eyes were rolled back and he twitched a couple of times before he sucked in a deep breath and looked Theo in the eye. â€Å"See. You change the association. Won’t be long and I’ll have that reaction without the electrodes glued to my scrotum.† â€Å"Are you okay?† â€Å"Oh yeah. It will take hold, I know it. It hasn’t worked with the rats yet, but I’m hoping it will before they all die.† â€Å"They’re dying of this?† â€Å"Well, it has to hurt or they’ll never learn.† Gabe held up his remote again and Theo snatched it out of his hand. â€Å"Stop it!† â€Å"I have another set of electrodes and receiver. You want to try it? I’ve been dying to try it out in the field. We could go to a titty bar.† Theo helped Gabe to his feet, then set him in a chair facing away from the rat table and pulled a chair around for himself. â€Å"Gabe, you are out of control. I’m sorry I didn’t call.† â€Å"I know you’ve been busy. It’s okay.† Great, now he has the appropriate Christmas Amnesty reaction, Theo thought. â€Å"These rats, the electrodes, all of it, it’s just wrong. You’re just going to end up with either a bunch of paranoid misogynist males, or a pile of corpses.† â€Å"You make that sound like a bad thing.† â€Å"You got your heart broken. It will heal.† â€Å"She said I was dull.† â€Å"She should see this.† Theo gestured around the room. â€Å"She wasn’t interested in my work.† â€Å"You guys had a good run. Five years. Maybe it was just time. You told me yourself that the human male was not evolved for monogamy.† â€Å"Yeah, but I had a girlfriend when I said that.† â€Å"So it’s not true?† â€Å"No, it’s true, but it didn’t bother me when I had a girlfriend. Now I know that I am biologically programmed to spread the seed of my loins far and wide, to as many females as possible, a series of torrid, meaningless matings, only to move on to the next fertile female. My genes are demanding that I pass them on, and I don’t know where to start.† â€Å"You might want to shower before you start the seed spreading.† â€Å"You don’t think I know that? That’s why I was trying to reprogram my impulses. Tame the animus, as it were.† â€Å"Because you don’t want to shower?† â€Å"No, because I don’t know how to talk to women. I could talk to Val.† â€Å"Val was a pro.† â€Å"She was not. She never turned a trick in her life.† â€Å"Listener, Gabe. She was a pro listener – a psychiatrist.† â€Å"Oh, right. Do you think I should start with a prostitute, or ‘tutes?† â€Å"For a broken heart? Yeah, I’m sure that will work just as well as the electrodes on your scrotum, but first I need you to do something for me.† Theo thought maybe, just maybe, work – nonfreakish work – might bring his friend back from the brink. He reached into his shirt pocket and pulled out the hank of yellow hair he’d taken out of the Volvo’s wheel well. â€Å"I need you to look at this and tell me about it.† Gabe took the hair and looked at it. â€Å"Is this crime stuff?† â€Å"Sort of.† â€Å"Where did you get it? What do you need to know?† â€Å"Tell me everything you can about it before I tell you anything, okay?† â€Å"Well, it appears to be blond.† â€Å"Thanks, Gabe, I was thinking maybe you could look at it under the microscope or something.† â€Å"Doesn’t the county have a crime lab for that?† â€Å"Yeah, but I can’t take it to them. There are circumstances.† â€Å"Like?† â€Å"Like they will think I’m stoned or nuts or both. Look at the hair,† Theo said. â€Å"You tell me. I’ll tell you. â€Å"Okay, but I don’t have all that cool CSI stuff.† â€Å"Yeah, but the guys at the crime lab don’t have batteries Super-Glued to their gonads. You’ve got them there.† Ten minutes later Gabe looked up from his microscope. â€Å"Well, it’s not human,† he said. â€Å"Swell.† â€Å"In fact, it doesn’t appear to be hair.† â€Å"So what is it?† â€Å"Well, it seems to have a lot of the qualities of optic fiber.† â€Å"So it’s man-made?† â€Å"Not so fast. It has a root, and what appears to be a cuticle, but it doesn’t look like keratin. I’d have to have it tested for proteins. If it’s manufactured, there’s no evidence of the process. It looks as if it was grown, not made. You know polar-bear hair has fiber-optic properties – channels light energy through to the black skin for heat.† â€Å"So it’s polar-bear hair?† â€Å"Not so fast.† â€Å"Gabe, goddammit, where in the hell did it come from?† â€Å"You tell me.† â€Å"Just us, okay? This doesn’t leave this cottage unless We get some confirmation, okay?† â€Å"Of course. Are you okay, Theo?† â€Å"Am I okay? You’re asking me if I’m okay?† â€Å"Everything all right with you and Molly? The job? You’re not smoking dope again, are you?† Theo hung his head. â€Å"You say you have another one of those electrodes?† Gabe brightened. â€Å"You’ll need to shave a spot. Can I open my present while you’re in the bathroom? You can use my razor.† â€Å"No, go ahead and open your present. I have some stuff I need to tell you.† â€Å"Wow, a salad shooter. Thanks, Theo.† â€Å"He took the salad shooter,† Molly said. â€Å"Wow, was that important to him?† Lena asked. â€Å"It was a wedding present.† â€Å"I know, I gave it to you. It was a wedding present to me and Dale, too.† â€Å"See, there was tradition.† Molly was inconsolable. She drank off half of her diet Coke and slammed the plastic Budweiser cup down on the bar like a pirate cursing over a schooner of grog. â€Å"Bastard!† It was Wednesday evening, and they were at the Head of the Slug saloon to coordinate the replanning of the food for the Christmas for the Lonesome party. Lena’s first reaction to Molly’s call to help was to beg off and stay at home, but even as she was creating an excuse, she realized that she’d only sit home obsessing alternately on getting caught for killing Dale and getting her heart broken by this strange, strange helicopter pilot. She decided that maybe meeting with Molly and Mavis down at the Slug wasn’t such a bad idea. And she might be able to find out from Molly if Theo suspected her in Dale’s disappearance. Yeah, fat chance, with Molly obsessing on Theo’s – whatever it was that Theo was supposed to have done wrong. It sounded to Lena like he had just taken a salad shooter to work with him. You were supposed to empathize with your friend’s problems, but they were, after all, your friend’s problems, and Lenaâ₠¬â„¢s friends, Molly in particular, could be a little wacky. The bar was full of singles in their twenties and thirties and you could feel a desperate energy sparking around the dark room, like loneliness was the negative and sex was the positive and someone was brushing the wires together over an open bucket of gasoline. This was the fallout of the holiday heartbreak cycle that started with young men who, lacking any stronger motivation toward changing their lives, would break up with their current girlfriend in order to avoid having to buy her a Christmas present. The distraught women would sulk for a few days, eat ice cream, and avoid calling relatives, but then, as the idea of a solitary Christmas and New Year started to loom large, they swarmed into the Slug in search of a companion, virtually any companion, with whom they could pass the holidays. Full speed ahead and forget the presents. Pine Cove’s male singles, to display their newfound freedom, would descend on the Slug, and avail themselves of the affections of dejected women in a game of small-town sexual musical chairs played hungrily to the tune of â€Å"Deck the Halls† – everyone hoping to have slipped drunkenly into someone more comfortable before the last fa was la-la-ed. There might have been a bubble around Lena and Molly, however, for they were obviously not part of the game. While both were certainly more than attractive enough to garner attention from the younger men, they had about them a mystique of experience, of having been there and moved on, of unbullshitability. Essentially, they scared the hell out of all but the drunkest of the Slug’s suitors, and the fact that they were drinking straight diet Coke scared the hell out of the drunks. Molly and Lena, despite their own personal distress, had slain their own holiday desperation dragons, which was how the Lonesome Christmas party had started in the first place. Now they were on to new, individual anxieties. â€Å"Sloppy joes,† said Mavis, a great cloud of low-tar smoke powering the announcement and washing over Lena and Molly. It had been illegal to smoke in California bars for years, but Mavis ignored the law and the authorities (Theophilus Crowe) and smoked on. â€Å"Who doesn’t like his meat sloppy on a bun?† â€Å"Mavis, it’s Christmas,† Lena said. So far Mavis had only suggested soupy or saucy entres – Lena suspected that Mavis had misplaced her dentures again and was therefore lobbying for a gummable feast. â€Å"With pickles, then. Red sauce, green pickles, Christmas theme.† â€Å"I mean shouldn’t we do something nice for Christmas? Not just sloppy joes?† â€Å"At five bucks a head, I told her that barbecue was the only way to feed them.† Mavis leaned in and looked at Molly, who was muttering malevolently into her ice cubes. â€Å"But everyone seems to think it’s going to rain. Like it ever rains in December.† Molly looked up and growled a little, then looked at the television screen behind Mavis and pointed. The sound was muted, but there was a weather map of California. About eight hundred miles off the coast there was a great blob of color whirling in jump-frame satellite-photo motion, making it appear that a Technicolor amoeba was about to consume the Bay Area. â€Å"Ain’t nothin’,† Mavis said. â€Å"They won’t even give it a name. If that thing was crouched like that over Bermuda, they’d have given it a name two days ago. Know why? ‘Cause they don’t come onshore here. That bitch will turn right a hundred miles off Anacapa Island and go down and dump all over the Yucatan. Meanwhile we won’t be able to wash our cars because of the drought.† â€Å"The rain at least will stop any sand-pirate attacks,† Molly said, crunching an ice cube. â€Å"Huh?† said Lena. â€Å"The hell did you say?† Mavis adjusted her hearing aid. â€Å"Nothing,† Molly said. â€Å"What do you guys think about lasagna? You know, some garlic bread, a little salad.† â€Å"Yeah, we can probably do it for five bucks a head if we don’t use sauce or cheese,† said Mavis. â€Å"Lasagna just doesn’t seem very Christmasy,† said Lena. â€Å"We could put it in Santa Claus pans,† Molly suggested. â€Å"No!† Lena snapped. â€Å"No Santas! We can do a snowman or something, but no friggin’ Santas.† Mavis reached over and patted Lena’s hand. â€Å"Santa played a little grab-ass with a lot of us when we were little, darlin’. Once your mustache starts growing you’re supposed to let go of that shit.† â€Å"I am not growing a mustache.† â€Å"Do you wax? Because you can’t see a thing,† said Molly, being supportive. â€Å"I do not have a mustache,† said Lena. â€Å"You think it’s bad being a Mexican, Romanian women have to start shaving when they’re twelve,† Mavis said. Lena took that opportunity to plant her elbows squarely on the bar and grip two great handfuls of her hair, which she began to pull, slowly and steadily, to make her point. â€Å"What?† said Mavis. â€Å"What?† said Molly. And there was an awkward moment of silence among the three – only the muted jukebox thumping in the background and the low murmur of people lying to one another. They looked around to avoid talking, then turned to the front door as Vance McNally, Pine Cove’s senior EMT, came through it and let loose a long, growling belch. Vance was in his midfifties, and fancied himself a charmer and a hero, when, in fact, he was a bit of a dolt. He had been driving the ambulance for over twenty years now, and nothing gave him pleasure like being the bearer of bad news. It was the measure of his importance. â€Å"You guys hear that the highway patrol found Dale Pearson’s truck parked up in Big Sur by Lime Kiln Rock? Looks like he was fishing and fell in. Yep, surf coming up from that storm, they’ll never find him. Theo’s up there now investigating.† Lena stumbled back to her bar stool and climbed up. She was sure everyone in the bar, all the locals anyway, were looking at her for a reaction. She let her long hair hang down by her face, hiding in it. â€Å"So, lasagna it is,† said Mavis. â€Å"But no fucking Santa pans!† Lena snapped, not looking up. Mavis pulled both of their plastic cups off the bar. â€Å"Normal circumstances, you’d be cut off, but as it is, I think you two really need to start drinking.† How to cite The Stupidest Angel Chapter 8, Essay examples

Tangled Web of Granny Flat Arrangements †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Tangled Web of Granny Flat Arrangements. Answer: Introduction In this assignment, the researcher has aimed to demonstrate the taxation system of a particular country with the help of five different case studies. It has also been aimed to seek complete understanding of implications of taxation with these given case references. In addition to these, the researcher has decided to take help from rules and laws provided by the governing body and certain legislations. Eric has purchased certain assets and shares over the last 12 months and he sold these assets and shares last week in the same year (Piketty Zucman, 2014). If the assets or shares are held for a year or less than a year will be called as short-term assets. Similarly, if the assets are held for more than a year, will be called as long-term assets. In this case, Eric has held them for less than a year and sold them in the same year. Computation of short-term capital gain or loss for the year ended List of assets purchased: List of assets sold: Shares of a listed company for $ 5,000 A home sound system for $ 12,000 A painting for $ 9,000 An antique chair for $ 3,000 An antique vase for $ 2,000 Shares of a listed company for $ 20,000 A home sound system for $ 11,000 A painting for $ 1,000 An antique chair for $ 1,000 An antique vase for $ 3,000 Total assets purchased = $ 31,000 Total assets sold = $ 36,000 Short term capital gain for the year ended = total assets sold - total assets purchased = $ 36,000 - $ 31,000 = $ 5,000 In this case reference Brian has received a loan as a part of his remuneration package for three years, because he is a bank executive, he received loan amounted to $ 1 million at a special rate of 1%. 40% of the loan was used for income-producing purposes and for meeting all interest payment obligations. In this case, Brian has received fringe benefit on the loan amount for the year 2016-2017. In addition, it can also be seen that loan has been provided on 1 April 2016. The computation of taxable income of Brian for the year ended 30 June 2017 is given below. Date of receiving loan = 1 April 2016 for 3 years Amount of loan = $ 1 million Rate of interest on loan = 1% (special interest rate or fringe benefit) Actual rate of interest on loan in the country is around 15% Mode of repayment of loan = Monthly installment Use of loan amount = $ 400,000 (40% of $ 1 million) Computation of installment for 15 months = ($ 1,000,000 * 1% / 12 months) * 15 months = ($ 10,000 / 12) * 15 months = $ 12,500 Computation of taxable income for the year ended 2016-2017 Income = $ 1,000,000 Less: expenses = $ 400,000 Less: repayment of installments (interest) = $ 10,000 Less: repayment of installments (principal) = $ 250,000 ($ 333,334 - $ 83,334) Total taxable income = $ 340,000 In this case, Brian has to pay tax on the taxable income amounted to $ 340,000, where the monthly installment (principal + interest) on the loan is $ 21,667 ($ 250,000 + $ 10,000). Hence, it can be concluded that Brian should pay for installments and due to this his taxable income is reduced by $ 21,667. On the flip side, if he has to repay the installment at the end of the loan, his taxable income would be different (Cerqueiro, Ongena Roszbach, 2016). The computation is given below. Income = $ 1,000,000 Less: expenses = $ 400,000 Total taxable income = $ 600,000 Thus, it can clearly be seen that monthly repayment of installment is beneficial for Brian, because in this case, he should pay tax on $ 340,000. However, on the other hand, he has to pay tax on $ 600,000, which could be very high (Hodgson Pearce, 2015). On the contrary, if in case bank releases Brain from repaying the interest on loan, he would then have to pay only the principal amount. In this case Brians expenses would slightly go down, but he then cannot claim fringe benefit on the loan and he must pay tax on the taxable income, which is computed below. Computation of taxable income for the year ended 2016-2017 Income = $ 1,000,000 Less: expenses = $ 400,000 Less: repayment of installments (principal) = $ 250,000 ($ 333,334 - $ 83,334) Total taxable income = $ 350,000 Therefore, it can clearly be seen that Brian has to pay tax on three different cases. If he has to pay installment (both principal and interest), he has to pay tax on $ 340,000. On the other hand, if was released from paying interest on loan, he has to pay tax on $ 350,000. However, in case if the installment should be paid at the end of the loan tenure, he has to pay tax on $ 600,000. Jack who is an architect and his spouse is only a housewife, together borrowed money to purchase a property for renting purpose as joint tenants. Interestingly both husband and wife have entered a contract where, it has been decided that if any profit arises 10% of that profit will be entitled to Jack and rest will be entitled to his wife Jill. On the contrary, if any loss occurs, Jack will bear 100% of the loss. However, in the last year the rental property has generated loss of $ 10,000 and as per agreement, Jack will bear the whole loss. According to the Section 35(2) of Relationship Act 2008, a person is not said to be the domestic partner of another person on the ground of relationship of co-tenancy (Johnstone, 2014). However, according to the Section 5(1) of Partnership Act 1958, partnership may be defined as the relationship between two or more parties, who are carrying on a same business with an aim to earn profit. Australian Partnership Act also describes the nature of partnership in case of joint tenancy and provides certain provisions regarding the nature of tenancy or property related to the joint tenancy, where it is said that Joint occupancy tenure in like manner joint property normal property or part proprietorship does not of itself make an organization as to anything so held or possessed whether the inhabitants or proprietors do or don't share any benefits made by the utilization thereof (Bennett, 2016). The sharing of gross returns does not of itself make an association whether the people sharing such returns have or have not a joint or basic right or enthusiasm for any property from which or from the utilization of which the profits are inferred. Moreover, the receipt by a man of an offer of the benefits of a business is at first sight confirm that that individual is an accomplice in the business, however the receipt of such an offer or of an installment dependent upon or differing with the benefits of a business does not of itself make that individual an accomplice in the business (McCullagh, 2015). However, in this case it has been found that Jack and Jill have domestic relationship and came into a contract of joint tenancy where both are entitled to profit of 1:9 ratio, but in case of loss only one partner is entitled to bear the full amount of loss. With respect to the provisions made in Relationship Act and Partnership Act, it can be said that Jack and Jill are no doubt in domestic relationship but in case of relationship of Joint tenancy, Partnership Act gets attracted, where they are considered to be in partnership relation since the nature of business is same, also both are entitled to profit, but in case of loss, only Jack has to bear the whole loss. In fact, in partnership act, only provision for partnership is given that all the partners are entitled to profit and not loss. If any partner alone bears the whole loss but also gets share of profit will be also be called partner (Willis, 2015). Therefore, the loss of $ 10,000 will completely be borne by Jack and he is entitled to get tax benefit on loss for the year ended. On the flip side, if both the partners decide to sell the property, they first have to recover loss arose from that property then they can sell the property. However, in this case, there is no scope for recovery of loss, thus they have to sell the property for capital loss. Further, this capital loss will be adjusted with the long-term or short-term capital gain. The facts held in the case of IRC vs. Duke of Westminster 1936 The Duke executed deeds with people then in his utilize (counting his planter) in which he covenanted to pay to them certain week by week aggregates for a time of seven years or the joint existences of the gatherings. The deeds recounted that the installments were made in acknowledgment of past administrations dependably rendered to the Duke and that the Duke wanted to make arrangement for the individual despite that he may proceed in the Duke's administration (in which occasion he will be qualified for compensation in regard of such future administration) or may stop to work for the Duke (Evans, 2015). Letters of clarification (which were recognized by the representatives) were sent to every worker illuminating him that he could assert full compensation for future work however that it was normal by and by that he would be content with the arrangement made by the deed in addition to such aggregate (assuming any) as may be important to convey the aggregate installments up to the level of the pay or wages he had of late been getting (AbdulRazaq Adam, 2015). The beneficiaries at the time the deeds were executed were accepting settled wages or compensations and after execution of the deeds proceeded in the Duke's business and kept on getting such aggregates as, with the whole payable by the deed, made up the measure of the wages or pay payable before the deed and no more. On the off chance that the sums paid under the deed in regard of periods amid which the people were in the Duke's utilize were compensation for administrations, they were not deductible in figuring the Duke's risk for surtax. In the event that, then again, the sums were yearly installments, they were deductible. Subsequently, the issue was whether the installments under the deeds were compensation for administrations or not (Bloom, 2015). It was indisputable that the deeds were conveyed into reality in order to allow the Duke to lessen his surtax obligation. The installments were not compensation for administrations. Three of the five Lords reasoned that the letter was not an agreement, just an outflow of expectation or reckoning and four of the five Lords presumed that, regardless of the possibility that it was an agreement, it was simply an agreement that the individual's compensation for future administrations won't be full compensation yet just the extra entirety alluded to in the letter. The fifth Lord, in contradict, inferred that the deed and letter ought to be seen together as a basically keeping up the current contract of administration instead of drastically adjusting it (Halberda, 2014). The majority of the Lords dismissed the recommendation that in income cases there is a principle that the court may overlook the lawful position and respect the substance of the issue. The substance is what comes about because of the lawful rights and commitments of the gatherings found out upon customary lawful standards. Principles established in the case of Duke of Westminster There is a particular offense identifying with the 'deceitful avoidance of wage impose' in the Taxes Acts, which was initially presented in 2000. Be that as it may, this enactment is not much of the time utilized, as the Revenue frequently wants to depend on the custom-based law when they indict (Krebs, 2016). Occasionally, you may find that a citizen is indicted under the Theft Act for false bookkeeping (or perhaps the Fraud Act 2006) yet the greater part of tax avoidance cases is brought under the customary law criminal offense of 'swindling general society income. There is no greatest punishment for such an offense if discovered liable so a respondent could be condemned to life detainment and in addition repaying the Revenue (Collins, 2016). The past Chancellor, Dennis Healey, broadly portrayed the distinction between impose shirking and tax avoidance as being "the thickness of a jail divider". In this case it has been found that the Bill wants to graze sheep in the land which he owns. But the problem here arises is with the tall pine trees in his land which needs to be cleared off. Later, Bill found that a logging company is ready to pay him $1,000 per 100 meters of timber which can be taken from his land. According to the relevant provisions of sale of goods act 1954 (Australia) the contract of sale can be made in writing which can be with or without seal or by word of mouth or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth. The price in the contract of sale can be considered as fixed if both the parties agree with each other. In simple words, it can be said that both the parties have to get into a contract of sale where they must follow some rules regarding purchase and selling (Vitry Roughead, 2014). One problem arises here, the buyer may not get the payment after fulfilling sellers need. Now in this case Bill is considered as seller who will be getting paid by a loggin g company for the clearance of trees in his land. If Bill agrees upon the payment offered to him by the company he will be getting good amount. For instance, let the measurement of Bills land be in meters, and it is assumed that the timber covers 4500 meters then he will get, for 100 meters Bill will be paid $1,000 for 1-meter Bill will be paid $(1,000/100) = $10 now for 4500 meters of land Bill will be given $(4500*10) $45000. Hence, as per assumed calculations it has been observed that for the clearance of 4500 meters of timber the company will be giving $45000 to Bill. Without investing any funds, the amount Bill is getting from the logging company is huge and can be a better deal (Leipold et al. 2016). Here another phase of the deal has been found where, if Bill will be given a lump sum of $50,000 by the logging company for the clearance of timber as per the requirement of the company (Douglas, Hall Gartner, 2015). The company offering him such a huge amount for the clearance, what if the owner of the land agrees upon this where both the parties have no idea about how much area does timber covers or how much timber the company needs. In this case may be the company is giving less amount for the timber that covers the land, or it may happen that the bill is getting more amount for less timber. Now it can be said that this deal may or may not be beneficial for one of the either parties. Therefore, according to observations which have been found studying the above case, it can be said that if Bill is offered a lump sum of $50,000 by the company for the clearance of timber it will be the best deal. Because if Bill agree to get paid $1,000 for every 100 meters then it would be a loss for him as per the assumed calculations above where he will be getting only $45,000 for 4500 meters of land that timber covers. Conclusion Efforts have been made to evaluate the different case references with respect to the taxation law. Based on the evaluation it has been found that in the first case reference Eric has earned capital gain of $ 5,000 and from the second case study, it can be concluded that in case if the installment should be paid at the end of the loan tenure, Brian has to pay tax on $ 600,000. References AbdulRazaq, M. T., Adam, K. I. (2015). Anti-Avoidance Legislations: Issues Doubts in the Application of Tax Rules in Nigeria.AGORA Int'l J. Jurid. Sci., 1. Bennett, R. J. (2016). Interpreting business partnerships in late Victorian Britain.The Economic History Review,69(4), 1199-1227. Bloom, D. (2015). Tax avoidance-a view from the dark side. Melb. UL Rev., 39, 950. Cerqueiro, G., Ongena, S., Roszbach, K. (2016). Collateralization, bank loan rates, and monitoring.The Journal of Finance,71(3), 1295-1322. Collins, J. (2016). Fraud by Abuse of Position and Unlicensed Gangmasters.The Modern Law Review,79(2), 354-363. Douglas, H., Hall, W., Gartner, C. (2015). E-cigarettes and the law in Australia.Australian family physician,44(6), 415. Evans, S. (2015). It's' Clean Hands' Again: The Dirtiness of Not Paying Tax Considered in the Supreme Court. Halberda, J. (2014). Mistake of law and mistake of fact in English law of restitution.Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d'Histoire du Droit/The Legal History Review,82(3-4), 261-283. Hodgson, H., Pearce, P. (2015). TravelSmart or travel tax breaks: is the fringe benefits tax a barrier to active commuting in Australia? 1.eJournal of Tax Research,13(3), 819. Johnstone, P. (2014). Planning reform, rescaling, and the construction of the postpolitical: the case of The Planning Act 2008 and nuclear power consultation in the UK.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,32(4), 697-713. Krebs, M. (2016). Analysis of the CSARS v NWK case and its effect on the substance over form-doctrine. Leipold, S., Sotirov, M., Frei, T., Winkel, G. (2016). Protecting First world markets and Third world nature: The politics of illegal logging in Australia, the European Union and the United States.Global Environmental Change,39, 294-304. McCullagh, R. (2015). The tangled web of Granny flat arrangements.LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal, (17), 82. Piketty, T., Zucman, G. (2014). Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries 17002010.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,129(3), 1255-1310. Vitry, A., Roughead, E. (2014). Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia.Health Policy,117(3), 345-352. Willis, J. (2015). Fraud and the indefeasibility of a joint tenant's title.Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association, (Winter 2015), 14.